A THW motion proposes an action or policy and asks debaters to debate its implementation. Unlike motions focused on abstract principles (like “This House Believes That”), THW motions are rooted in policy and often require practical and detailed arguments about the consequences of enacting the proposed change.
The focus is on implementing a specific action or policy. Debaters must discuss the practicalities and implications of this action.
These motions require debaters to think like policymakers, addressing logistics, enforcement, and impact.
The debate often revolves around comparing the proposed action to the status quo or alternative solutions.
The Proposition team must provide a clear plan or model for implementing drug legalization, addressing how it will work and the anticipated benefits.
Proposition could argue that:
The Opposition team must argue against the feasibility or desirability of the policy, focusing on its drawbacks and unintended consequences.
Opposition could argue that:
Clearly define what the motion entails. For example, in the drug legalization motion, specify whether all drugs include recreational and prescription drugs, how the policy will be regulated, and who the key stakeholders are.
Provide a clear and practical plan for implementing the policy. For example:
Establish a government-regulated framework for production, distribution, and sales.
Outline safeguards, such as age restrictions, licensing, and quality controls.
Acknowledge potential harms but show how they can be minimized or argue that the policy contradicts societal values or sets a dangerous precedent. Highlight potential harms/benefits that the other team has overlooked
Compare the proposed policy to the status quo or alternative policies, demonstrating why the your team’s approach is superior.