A THS motion endorses a specific idea, policy, institution, or trend. The focus of the debate is on whether the subject of the motion is desirable, beneficial, or worthy of support. Unlike a “This House Would” motion, which often focuses on implementation, a THS motion emphasizes the value or importance of the subject itself.
The Proposition team must argue why the subject is worth supporting, showcasing its merits, benefits, and alignment with societal goals or values.
The Opposition team must argue against the endorsement, often by critiquing its effectiveness, feasibility, or ethical implications.
THS debates often examine the broader societal, economic, or cultural implications of supporting the idea or policy.
The Opposition may propose better alternatives to the subject, though this is not mandatory.
The Proposition must argue why universal basic income (UBI) is a desirable policy, focusing on its potential to:
The Opposition must challenge the desirability of UBI by focusing on:
Identify the key advantages of the subject and provide evidence to substantiate these claims.
Identify and emphasize the potential harms or limitations of the subject. Use logical and evidence-based reasoning to show why these outweigh the benefits.
Anticipate arguments about practicality and cost. Provide realistic solutions to these concerns.
Argue that the idea is impractical or unsustainable. Use data to demonstrate logistical or financial barriers.
Highlight the alignment of the subject with societal values like fairness, equity, or freedom.
Discuss opportunity costs, showing that resources spent on the subject could be better allocated elsewhere.
Question whether the subject truly aligns with societal values or whether it could lead to unintended moral consequences.